The process of working in a research group wasn't really the problem. My partner and I do have the ethic to work on something as hard as this project, and write and work together and create something. It's not the partner thing that is the REAL problem with this project, the real problem is the kind of details the project involves. Creating a DOCUMENTARY with or without a group of people to help you is kind of hard. The process of coming up with an idea good enough to go on for 10 minutes kind of worries me and I'm sure it's worrying my partner. We have the basic idea and first part of the project done, we were able to transcribe and write an oral history from interviewing an vegetarian friend. The next step or the part 2 of this process is what is really bothering me. I don't know where to go from here, we got done part 1 but part 2 just seems so much more....drastic. In this project so far my group partner have contributed about the same, although, I must say Sarah has done a little more typing with the part 1 part of the paper. Besides that we communicate fine, we constantly go back and forth through email or twitter, discussing what needs to be done and how we're going to go about doing a certain part of the project. Stuff like that is not really a problem, it's just videotaping a documentary that's really making me go crazy. To prepare for the upcoming presentations my group needs to really get an idea for a documentary. We need to figure out where we are to go from here, and how we will incorporate the theme of our project into our documentary. We still have a little way to go but I'm hoping, somehow, we get the documentary done. We need to figure out what we're going to video tape, what kind of questions we'll ask in the documentary, how we're going to make it 10 minutes. A lot of rattling is going on in my brain and I'm sure my partners. Hopefully we'll figure out how to overcome this obstacle, even though are schedules are both so hectic. Between work and other class projects coinciding with this one, there isn't a lot of free time between us to get this thing done. I think this project went a little too far with the videotaping and all; but, I'm sure we'll find away around it...somehow.
 
    To transcribe this oral history our group needed to find a person to interview. After thinking about it for sometime we figured out who best to interview. We then contacted this person and set up a time where we all could meet and interact with each other. We chose Rowan's library for this, since it is so quiet and one can concentrate better there. When we met with our interviewee (Janine) we told her to just tell us whatever she new about organic foods/her past with being a vegetarian and how that effected her. She did not want to be voice recorded (as we had hoped) so instead Sarah did some transcribing while we all had a conversation about Janine take on being a vegetarian. As she began speaking we had to write down, word for word, exactly what she was saying so that the transcribed outline would be as close to word for word as possible. When transcribing and interview it is hard to notice when you have 15 minutes of back and forth (between the interviewer and interviewee) so we decided to talk for about a half hour or maybe even a little more. During this half hour we wrote down EVERYTHING we spoke, even the stupid silly stuff like "huh, and EW" anything spoken was transcribed on the paper. Transcribing made posting the oral history quite easy, we took something Janine said and ran with it into a story. It wasn't as hard as one would think to make a story out of a conversation, even if that conversation was on paper.
 
For our Oral History we interviewed Janine Strugis, a junior at Rowan University. The interview took place in the library, surrounded by maybe one or two other people. Janine did not want to be recorded in any form, so we took copious notes on everything that was said. Before going into the interview, we knew that Janine was a vegetarian, and with that fact, we determined to center our questions on organic foods. We held a high interest in what organic foods were and whether or not they were healthy for you, or if they were in fact healthier than non-organic foods. With that, we thought Janine would be a perfect candidate. But after the interview began, we found it hard to incorporate our organic food questions, and found ourselves asking questions that centered around the fact that she is a vegetarian and partial vegan. When we learned that she was a partial vegan, the interview turned more in another direction, since the two of us conducting the interview had no idea what a vegan was, but had heard of the term. And when the organic questions came around, we felt as though they were merely brushed over, forced, and we instantly flipped our attention back to Janine’s eating habits and lifestyle.
 
    The technologies that I am planning to use for the final project that are new to me aren’t really new for me. MY group has decided to do the paper option rather than the documentary so most of our project will be written as we did our interview through a transcript type of method. To do this we did have to use a computer to keep up with every single word that was spoken between the interviewer and interviewee. What really prompted our group to go the paper route instead of the video or audio method when doing our report was the interviewee. She/he did not seem too thrilled about being videotaped so before we met we offered to do it in an audio type method where we would just ask her/him questions and record her answers.
    When the day finally came to do the interview the interviewee seemed very nervous at the thought of having his/her voice recorded as she/he was afraid they would sound weird or it would not work as we wanted. If the documentary had been required for this project we probably would not have been able to use the same subject for interviewing as they did not feel comfortable with either the video or audio method. We would then have to scour the earth trying to find another person that has some sort of relation with our research subject. Also if the documentary had been required I would have felt a lot more pressure about finding someone who really has a field of expertise on what our research is relating to. Finding someone like this in the amount of time we were given would probably be an incredibly frustrating task because we really wouldn’t know where to start.